PDA

View Full Version : Hatch Slams 'Galactica' Remake


DangerWillRobinson
08-23-2003, 10:44 AM
Author: Michael Hinman
Date: 08-23-2003
Source: Sci-Fi Pulse

Now that the reimagining of the Sci-Fi Channel miniseries "Battlestar Galactica" is in the can, an actor of the original show is speaking out once again over the way the cable channel is handling the franchise.

Richard Hatch, who played Capt. Apollo in the original series, had tried a couple years ago to revive the venerable science-fiction franchise, and was among several people who believed they had the rights to the show.

However, in the end, the Sci-Fi Channel won out, and brought in "Star Trek: Deep Space Nine" alumnus Ronald D. Moore to reimagine the series through a backdoor pilot. Hatch recently reaffirmed his opposition to the new project to Sci-Fi Pulse.

"I think the reimagining of 'Battlestar' is the result of a network that does not truly understand its core audience," Hatch said. "The Sci-Fi Channel is unfortunately becoming anything but the Sci-Fi Channel. Due to the fact that the science-fiction demographic is 18 to 49, not 12 to 24, I would think that they would be trying to appeal to a slightly older and more sophisticated audience."

Like some fans of the series, Hatch has expressed displeasure with the fact that two of the characters from the original series get a sex change in the new miniseries. He said it goes against what the original series was about, and what original fans are asking for.

"How can they justify changing two of 'Galactica's' most popular characters into women?" Hatch said. "That is just a slap in the face to fans. In fact, 'Battlestar' already had several strong female characters to draw from, but they chose instead to leave them out and dramatically alter the remaining male ones.

"Why couldn't they have just created some new female characters as opposed to messing with existing ones? It surprises me that they did not give Capt. Apollo a sex change as well."

Hatch said that he felt Moore is on the right track by blurring the solid lines between good and evil that was prevalent on television in the 1970s when BSG was first airing, but at the same time, it was wrong to blur those lines using existing characters.

"Ron Moore has some very good ideas concerning science-fiction in general, and I can see where he is going by trying to make his characters more conflicted," Hatch said. "That's a very plausible direction to go in when dealing with new and unfamiliar characters, but you can't take well-established characters from a sci-fi classic and dramatically alter them without alienating your core fan base."

Hatch even went as far as saying that the Moore miniseries shouldn't even carry the series name.

"They should not really call this remake 'Battlestar Galatica,' because it goes completely against the spirit and the original premise of the show," he said. "A spinoff or an entirely different title would be more appropriate. This epic series was about three generations of family: heroic, characters struggling to survive and find a new homeland against impossible odds. The characters were flawed but endearing, and they always pulled together when the chips were down. We always cared and rooted for them and their heroic struggle to survive against the unknown darkness."

grinner
08-23-2003, 10:53 AM
"I think the reimagining of 'Battlestar' is the result of a network that does not truly understand its core audience," Hatch said. "The Sci-Fi Channel is unfortunately becoming anything but the Sci-Fi Channel. Due to the fact that the science-fiction demographic is 18 to 49, not 12 to 24, I would think that they would be trying to appeal to a slightly older and more sophisticated audience." wow... someone who feels like we do... amazing.

vhsiv
08-23-2003, 11:43 AM
Richard Hatch:
"I think the reimagining of 'Battlestar' is the result of a network that does not truly understand its core audience," Hatch said. "The Sci-Fi Channel is unfortunately becoming anything but the Sci-Fi Channel. Due to the fact that the science-fiction demographic is 18 to 49, not 12 to 24, I would think that they would be trying to appeal to a slightly older and more sophisticated audience."I take this as a reading of the network, rather than the BSG remake.

In what little of the Ron Moore script I have read, it's fairly clear that the intended audience isn't anywhere near 12 yrs. old. There's too much sexual content, though no frontal nudity (the spine of the Cylon 'Six' apparently glows, when she has intercourse with Baltar).

I think that Skiffy would really like to be MTV, but to do both 'science-fiction' and a younger demographic you have to make sure that your product is REALLY good, and not just fodder for household re-enactments of MST3K.
________
Mflbv (http://vaporizer.org)

Huh
08-23-2003, 12:18 PM
Originally posted by vhsiv
I think that Skiffy would really like to be MTV, but to do both 'science-fiction' and a younger demographic you have to make sure that your product is REALLY good, and not just fodder for household re-enactments of MST3K.

I truly believe that the sci fi channel doesn't want to be a science fiction channel. Science fiction is their bread and butter right now, and will probably always be a part of their lineup. But I think that if things continue the way they are going, the SFC will be as much a science fiction channel as MTV is a music video channel.

Twich
08-23-2003, 12:38 PM
Bonnie Hammer has made several comments in interviews about the new direction the network hopes and wants to go. She has made it very plain with the new offerings that they have (the ones you don't have to think about) that the network does NOT want to be known as sophisticated...OR catering to an intelligent audience. They WANT the people who don't think and don't want to think.

:rolleyes:

Which means that I will not associate myself with a network that refuses to think I am not smart enough to follow the plot lines of a story arc.

Twich
08-23-2003, 12:41 PM
Just in case anyone is interested, you can send a thank you note to Mr. Hatch and let him know that you appreciate his views.

The address is:

webmaster@battlestargalactica.com


You can also sign up for his newsletter/updates for free. I would suggest we all do so to support him. :)

www.richardhatch.com

If no one minds, I'm going to recopy this to campaign strat so we can all thank him for his comments. :)

BillFrugge
08-23-2003, 01:04 PM
Originally posted by grinner
wow... someone who feels like we do... amazing.

IMHO, none of this would be happening without the support of Mr. Hatch. He had believed that the interest in the series was gone until he went to a convention - it was there that he found the world of fandom.

After that, he learned that there was a lot of interest in bringing back the series. With the aid of his cast members and crew, he invested heavily into making a short film demonstrating what a return could be like. He proceeded to write new books that continue the series. He excited the fans, and got the studio's attentions.

It's a shame that no one listened to what he had to say. After all, it was he who talked with fans and learned what they wanted.

Antrobus
08-24-2003, 08:26 PM
"They should not really call this remake 'Battlestar Galatica,' because it goes completely against the spirit and the original premise of the show,"

Precisely! The miniseries/series should have had a different name with a tag that described it as loosely based on Battlestar Galactica.

It's sad that SciFi and some other channels don't want to challenge their audiences. It's very toublesome that the media we've helped create is now trying to "dumb us down". :mad:

Well not me! I'll just choose to keep that "off" button on "off" or else find a channel that does have something challenging. There are still a few of them out there !!

shamecube
08-25-2003, 05:02 PM
The Sci-fi channel gets more bad press. How much more can it get?

But Skiffy's bad press often is from those disgruntled with the network's decisions.

And I am no one to talk. I viewed the rest of Sci-fi's offerings as sub-par. They got lucky with FS. Even their DUNE stuff was tedious and they had great stuff to work with.

I actually watched SPIKE the other night and thought that BSG reruns would be great on the channel.

vhsiv
08-27-2003, 06:00 AM
I wouldn't be surprised if 'Spike' flip-floppped into a de facto science-fiction channel 6 or 8 months from now. I really don't know how well they're doing with this 'men's programming' business, but they're already ahead of Skiffy, in that there's always something watchable on the network at 8pm each night.

Mini-marathons of 'Real TV' and 'Blind Date' signify - to me - that they really haven't gotten their footing together. 'Striparella' is ok, but somehow I find it difficult to imagine a second season. And 'Gary the Rat'? 'NewsRadio' already did a better job with all of those themes, and Kelsey Grammer is no Phil Hartman (sniff, sniff). For all of the controversy surrounding the network launch, it still hasn't 'taken off', given the sophistication of other Viacom-owned networks (internally known as 'MTV Networks'), MTV, VH1, Nickelodeon and Comedy Central (the real men's network) and Spike has yet to broadcast a single film...

For a 'guys' network there really isn't a lot of action or the GQ-ism (or the Maxim-ism) that they seemed to be projecting early on (no car commercials, no computer ads). Maybe it's time to write some letters to them

Just remember that Skiify's contracts for 'ST:TOS' expire in 2005, and all those 'Twilight Zone' episodes are also owned by Viacom - there's an opportunity to be seized here.

Ooooh - and Paramount also owns the 1976 remake of 'King Kong', with Jeff Bridges and Jessica Lange - a guy's movie if there ever was one. When was the last time THAT film was broadcast on basic cable? Get some 'Swingers'-type hosts to introduce the film and do promo spots, and you're money.
________
LovelyWendie (http://www.lovelywendie99.com/)

shamecube
08-28-2003, 10:41 AM
Spike's graphic design seems, um, very cartoonish for a supposed men's network. And they show Dove conditioner commercials where a woman tells how silky her hair is after using Dove. Do men like women with silky hair? Or better yet, do men want to hear women talk about how silky their hair is? Granted, my only regular dose of heterosexual maleness is Bob and Tom so I can't really judge. But from watching The Man Show from time to time I would wager a guess that talking about hair is not something men find attractive.

Anyway...I really couldn't distinguish Spike from any other network. I've quit watching the Discovery Channel because that network is designed with channel surfers in mind and it's agonizing to sit through the same promos over and over. But they are in tune with their core audience.

Da-Met
08-29-2003, 01:20 PM
Despite my violent dislike for Sci-Fi because of Farscape, I have to say I'm looking forward to the new BSG. Having read the scripts, despite a few lame moments in the waek first half hour, I dont feel the story is 'dumbed down' at all. It's much smarter and more inteligent than the old BSG, and Ron Moore has always been a very good writer. One of the few good things to come out of modern Star Trek. DS9 was a fantastic show, and Moore had some of the best teleplays from it (Rocks and Shoals, The Die is Cast, In the Cards, Inter Arma Enim Silent Leges, Tacking against the wind, Waltz). Even the character that starts out seeming like a 'sexpot' has some really interesting philosophical questions raised, once she starts getting exposed to human culture, self questioning, purpose (which based on Moore's comments and hints in the script, will be examined when it comes to Cylons sent to infiltrate humans).

in the end, its just a shame that it's going to air on SKIFFY. It will be the first non-Farscape Sci-Fi I've watched since the cancellation. If anything, I'm surprised that bonnie hammer is even involved, it seems a little to smart for her. Or maybe she saw the hot chick and the space scenes and just went 'ooooohhhh aaaaahhh' while Ron Moore slipped in some deeper themes.

on a tangent, it's too bad Berman didn't hire Moore for the new ST series instead of Brannon Braga. ST fans would be happy to be getting a show with some GOOD storytelling behind it instead of Enterprsie... BSG fans would be happy b/c their show wasn't being remade by Moore. Everybody woulda won in some fashion. Thanks a lot Berman. :mad: (I have many issues with Berman and Braga, can ya tell? ;) )