PDA

View Full Version : Taking Requests: Most Abused Skiffy Presentation


vhsiv
10-26-2003, 02:33 AM
After watching the DVD of 'Dagon' yesterday evening - incidentally, the 'Best DVD Presentation Winner' at last year's Saturn Awards - it really hit home how savagely films get abused when shown on Skiffy. First it's the requisite cuts for commercial breaks, then it's the cuts for mature language and content, and then it's the cuts for length and the commercial breaks, again.

Granted, it's the year 2003, and many of the cable nets have relaxed their prohibitions against language, violence and sexual content. But if the audience for science fiction is 18-34 and 18-49, it seems to me that Skiffy doesn't need to be doing the Net Nanny thing, particularly on the late-evening broadcasts. FX, BBCAmerica, PBS, A&E and even Bravo respect the intelligence and maturity of their audience enough to leave some of the grittier content in their presentations after 10pm. But not Skiffy or USA - they've made John Carpenter's 'The Thing' virtually unwatchable, as there's a point in the film where almost every 3rd word is a curse word - with good reason - yet Skiffy and USA *bleep* it out, or insert some *darn*, *stupid* overdubbing that's clearly at variance with the crisis at hand.

The same can be said of 'Farscape', and the decision to cut the PG-13 'morning after' J/A scene from 'A Human Reaction'. My point here, is that with 'Dagon', they took a very skillful, deliberate and atmospheric film, and reduced it to a Grade-D schlocker. As much has been said by the producer of 'Dog Soldiers' - "If you saw it on the SciFi Channel, then you really haven't seen it at all...", he apparently said, this past year at the Saturn Awards ceremony.

If the quality of the entertainment is there, I will happily sit through all of the commercials for 'Farscape', 'The Shield', 'Nip/Tuck' and 'MI-5'. But if I know that something's been altered for length, content or political correctness, I quickly lose interest - for that reason, there are few USA films in my future, and even fewer TBS and TNT presentations.

So, has anyone else here had the content of a favorite film or show mauled because Mommy and Daddy SciFi didn't think it was 'age-appropriate'?

If I get enough responses, I'll put up a poll.

(I'm one to think that Bonnie's ratings would go up, and stay up, if only she realized that the majority of her potential audiece *is* adult, and often *educated*.)

grinner
10-26-2003, 07:18 AM
Dog Soldiers is a much better film when viewed in its entirety. There are a few scenes with Sean Pertwee that didn't make the Skiffy cut that help the movie along. Damn you Skiffy...

RescueFarscape
10-26-2003, 04:26 PM
The only Skiffy movie I've seen was 'Epoch.' :hork: Never again.

I started watching the SCI FI Channel for their series, not the movies. Guess I'm SOL :rolleyes:

studentsteve
10-26-2003, 04:34 PM
Dog soldiers was great. Should not be cut which scene is best the decapitation in the bar or sean pertwee son of dr who having his guts super glued back together always wondered why skin bonded best with that glue. In this day and age parents should be able to stop there kids watching unsuitable films and the rest of us should be left to enjoy movies uncut :mad:

Scarran Raptor
10-26-2003, 10:38 PM
"army of darkness" arguably the greatest "mentally unbalanced time-traveller vs. undead hordes" movie of our time should not be edited, the first edit which pissed me off was altering "yo! she-bitch, let's go" to "yo! she-witch, let's go" and then there's the edit that just plain baffles me, they cut Ash's name out of the line "I'm bad ash, you're good ash" he wasn't saying ass, he was saying his name!

Kurt_eh
10-26-2003, 10:57 PM
This aint a Skiffy cut, and I can't even remember who did it, but my favourit 'frivilous' edit was in King Ralph.

It's the scene when he's speaking with the King from Africa (can't remember the country) and explaining what every red-blooded American thinks when he's buyng a new car:

"Will this car get me*broads?*" was inserted over "laid."

Now, between you and me, doesn't the edit seem more offensive than the actual dialogue?