Who'd win this fight???

[talyn3]

The battle of secert government agents with special powers.



Fawkes for sure

[NYPinTA]

Your kidding right?

The only thing those two would fight over is hair products.

:rollin:

[talyn3]

Originally posted by NYPinTA
Your kidding right?

The only thing those two would fight over is hair products.

:rollin:



maybe, but who would win???

[SabaceanBabe]

I'm with you on this one, talyn3...

Darien is a lot more conniving and sneaky. They may be about even on intelligence and the "enhancements," but that sneaky bit will win out every time. ;)

[Third EYe]

I say neither.

I dont' have a reason, I just wanted to be in the minority so I can get some meddling social group to throw money at me.

[B Sharp]

Originally posted by Third EYe
I say neither.

I dont' have a reason, I just wanted to be in the minority so I can get some meddling social group to throw money at me.

I'm on the board of directors for a meddling social group, and all I can say is that those who vote 'neither' can't be helped- they seem to refuse joining in any special interest groups.

unfortunately for me, that's the way I voted as well- mostly because I just don't care who wins.

Re hair products...does I-Man's power have any impact on the his hair- i.e. make his hair stick up like that? If so, maybe it's not a product, just a side effect. And does Jake ever have trouble with his hair products since the nanobots are always cleaning up his cells? Maybe they only work on live cells, and since hair is dead, then.... oh, never mind. :ewink:

[Third EYe]

At this rate I'm never gonna get any money.

[stellar]

Let's not forget what Paul Ben-Victor brings to the match.

[talyn3]

Originally posted by stellar
Let's not forget what Paul Ben-Victor brings to the match.


Yeah, watch out for Eberts too.

[stellar]

Eberts... whatever happened to that show? At one time that was a good show... so was GvsE. Man, Vivendi sure knows how to Fu*k up a good thing.

[Darth Buddha]

Originally posted by stellar
Eberts... whatever happened to that show? At one time that was a good show... so was GvsE. Man, Vivendi sure knows how to Fu*k up a good thing.

Can't agree on GvsE, but I LOVED I-MAN.

We get Farscape back, maybe we can join the I-MAN folks then, or adopt 'em.

[NYPinTA]

All Fawkes could do was go invisible. How is he going to beat a guy all amped up like Jake 2.0 is?
I like Fawkes better- and I would want him to win, but he just isn't. Even going invisible the other kid could probably hear him with his bionic hearing or whatever and take him out.
Sorry folks. Fawkes does not get the last can of mousse.

[Third EYe]

Fawkes could freeze things.

[NYPinTA]

Originally posted by Third EYe
Fawkes could freeze things.

Oh snap! I forgot about that.... but I'm staying with my first pick.
Jake 2.0- but I wouldn't be happy about it.

[Lord Loser]

Let's see, a career criminal against a computer geek. I still have to vote with Fawkes.

[MrVesham]

Originally posted by stellar
Eberts... whatever happened to that show? At one time that was a good show... so was GvsE. Man, Vivendi sure knows how to Fu*k up a good thing.
Seriously, I loved GvsE. Pure campy goodness. "Hey! Hey, orange Volvo!" Gotta love it.

Anyway, I have to agree that Jake 2.0, while not my favorite, would probably win. I think they'd need to upgrade the gland for it to be a fair fight.

But how's this...

Iman's Eberts versus Jake 2.0's Dr. Thora. =]

[talyn3]

Originally posted by MrVesham


Iman's Eberts versus Jake 2.0's Dr. Thora. =]

no, no, no, The Keeper vs. Dr. Thora. Now we got a fight.


The keeper would destroy her. But it would be entertaining.

[MrVesham]

Right, Claire's too tough (good god, remember that hand-cannon she was packin in that one ep?!) and not nerdy enough. It's all stacked in her favor from the get-go. Still wouldn't mind seeing it, though. :ewink:

Wow. Seriously. I think this is the first "who would win in a fight" thread I've ever really read or posted in.

[Editted, because I skipped over your last line... missed the point originally. Doh!]

[Kurt_eh]

Originally posted by talyn3
maybe, but who would win???

Angel, and his "Nancy-Boy Hair Gel" ;)

[VBKatLou]

While I love Fawkes and Hobbs, I'm gonna say Victor Mansfield and Mac Ramsey from Once A Thief.

Just to be different. :D


BTW - the I-Maniacs are still driving a campaign to bring back I-Man. And they were very supportive and helpful to Scapers, particularly at the beginning of our campaign. :)


edited to add: this got me thinking about I-Man and I went to the dom message board and snurched this one.

Date: 10/10/2003
From: Dariens_sugar

i just got this from perseusproject. things are really looking up!
(d_s does a dance of joy!)

VINCE INVITED TO GUEST IN "COLD CASE"
According to Craig Silverstein, Greg Yataines, who invited Vince and Paul to guest in the “Las Vegas” episode, also asked Vince last month to guest in an episode of CBS’s Sunday night crime drama, “Cold Case”. Neither Craig or Vince elaborated. If we hear anything more, we’ll post it.

***********************************************
JOEL BISSONETTE GUESTS IN "COLD CASE"
Joel guests as "Carl" in this Sunday’s “Cold Case” episode entitled “Useless Cats”. The episode revolves around a serial rapist who announces to the squad that he has returned to Philadelphia and plans to attack again. Sunday,Oct. 12th, 8 PM, CBS.

************************************************
"LAS VEGAS EPISODE UPDATE"
Vince reported that the “Las Vegas” episode that he and Paul are in is #7, “Pros & Cons”. He and Paul play the roles of two neurotic gamblers who insist on using the same stools, gaming table, and table attendant who collects and pays bets. Forget, Elliot and Michael. Vince claims that it’s basically “Fawkes and Hobbes in Vegas!” Nov 3rd, 9 PM, NBC