PDA

View Full Version : California law pushed by animal group requires $78 dollars to use mouse traps


Harveylives
11-29-2003, 12:06 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YOUR GOVERNMENT AT WORK
Arrest for catching mouse?
California law pushed by animal group requires trapping license

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: November 29, 2003
1:00 a.m. Eastern



© 2003 WorldNetDaily.com

A California law requires a trapping license in order to kill mice.

The Animal Protection Institute of Sacramento pushed the bill, which mandates anyone who takes furbearing mammals or non-game animals must purchase a trapping license by passing a complex test and paying a fee of $78.50, the San Francisco Chronicle reported.

The Fish and Game Code 4005 defines non-game animals as including mice, rats, gophers and moles, the paper noted.

However, Scott Paulsen, chief of law enforcement for the Department of Fish and Game, said the law would not be enforced for personal use.

Nevertheless, he says, the statute is enforced for commercial use.

That means if a citizen hires a gardener or pest control service to set traps at his house, they could face arrest without a permit.

Terry Knight of the Lake County Fish and Wildlife Committee said the DFG did not support the bill but it was promoted by the Animal Protection Institute.

"I can see the headlines now, 'Mice trappers face jail term,' " Knight said. "But if you get the permit, the real problem you're facing is that it takes too many mice to make a fur coat."

Third EYe
11-29-2003, 12:12 PM
ROFL

Next they are going to try and ban using the word Christmas to describe, um, well, uh...Christmas.

This so funny. Kill me before it gets any funnier.

Harveylives
11-29-2003, 12:16 PM
Originally posted by Third EYe
ROFL

Next they are going to try and ban using the word Christmas to describe, um, well, uh...Christmas.

This so funny. Kill me before it gets any funnier.


I would but I don't think I can afford the fee for a human.

Famira Damaris
11-29-2003, 12:32 PM
That is so frelling ridiculous. And I'm sure they'll start banning the word "snow" from standardized tests because some kids might not've seen snow. :rolleyes:

Darth Buddha
11-29-2003, 12:37 PM
Originally posted by Famira Damaris
That is so frelling ridiculous. And I'm sure they'll start banning the word "snow" from standardized tests because some kids might not've seen snow. :rolleyes:
It's being tried right now... I read a blurb on that very point and very word a few months ago. Can't seem to find it again, though.

Famira Damaris
11-29-2003, 12:39 PM
Yeah, I was thinking of that. Someone at another message board posted this article about California school books being censored to hell. Wish I could find the link: "yacht" being taken out because it was considered "elitist", one of the classic examples. *eyerolls*

Judith
11-29-2003, 12:41 PM
One tiny thing:

When I read this article...I thought..."this can't be the whole story. Something else is going on here". Which might be the case.

Darth Buddha
11-29-2003, 12:45 PM
The good part is that the Department of Fish and Game is fixing the stupidity of the legislature with discretionary enforcement.

grinner
11-29-2003, 12:46 PM
There was an article about snow posted here. I don't remember the title... and searching for snow might yield a bunch of threads.

Darth Buddha
11-29-2003, 12:52 PM
More FMD members get their news from grinner than any other single source!

grinner
11-29-2003, 12:53 PM
:innocent::woohoo::g2f:

grinner
11-29-2003, 12:56 PM
I just did a search... and it isn't in the archives any longer... might have been purged.

But the other word that might be removed is Ocean... as there are supposedly some that have never seen/been to the ocean... and they might be discriminated against.

Harveylives
11-29-2003, 01:02 PM
Originally posted by Darth Buddha
More FMD members get their news from grinner than any other single source!

True.:notworthy

Darth Buddha
11-29-2003, 01:04 PM
Originally posted by Harveylives
True.:notworthy
Sorry, Harveylives, that was rude of me to post in one of YOUR threads... but you made a very respectable showing in that poll as well!

Harveylives
11-29-2003, 01:07 PM
No, thats fine. Grinner is the true god of the news. I'm not even in the same league as grinner. I like to think of Grinner as a mentor.

Darth Buddha
11-29-2003, 01:12 PM
Hey, HarveyLives, you beat out all three US broadcast networks... you ARE FMD sciences news!

CBS News (60 Minutes, Evening News, etc.) 6 1.88%
NBC News (Dateline, Meet the Press, etc.) 9 2.82%
ABC News (Evening News, This Week, etc.) 5 1.57%
CNN International 7 2.19%
BBC 14 4.39%
Reuters 13 4.08%
NPR 11 3.45%
News Hour with Jim Lehrer 8 2.51%
Harveylives at FMD OT 10 3.13%
CNN 17 5.33%
MSNBC 14 4.39%
Headline News 9 2.82%
USA Today 2 0.63%
The Week 1 0.31%
Wall Street Journal 3 0.94%
CNBC 5 1.57%
Fox News Channel 15 4.70%
Drudge Report 7 2.19%
grinner at FMD OT 18 5.64%

Harveylives
11-29-2003, 01:15 PM
I'm very flattered, thanks to all. My motivating factor is the love of science. I just can't get enough of the amazing things scientists are doing these days.

grinner
11-29-2003, 01:28 PM
ah... stop it. It is just on my daily wandering thru internet news sources... that I find interesting things... and I figured that some people don't have the weird drive to read alot of newspaper/articles that I seem to have.

Darth Buddha
11-29-2003, 02:06 PM
Don't know if that modest objection was directed at me, too, but...

Hey, as far as I am concerned I bust both your chops often enough that I don't think credit where credit is due is out of line. That's why I put you both separately in the poll in the first place.

Despite the fact that I frequently disagree with either or both of you, the board would be a lot less interesting if either of you headed for other posting pastures.

Dammit, Jim, I'm a critic, not a sychophant!