PDA

View Full Version : DVD fanaticism: It's what's for dinner


stellar
04-07-2004, 08:24 AM
DVD fanaticism: It's what's for dinner

http://www.cnn.com/2004/SHOWBIZ/Movies/04/06/dvd.collectors/index.html

By Nick Nunziata
CNN Headline News
Tuesday, April 6, 2004 Posted: 2:46 PM EDT (1846 GMT)

(CNN) -- Before we go to the core of this week's article, allow me a brief dissertation on the "widescreen vs. fullscreen" DVD debate. In my opinion, there's no reason to buy a fullscreen DVD. Thank you. Now, back to our regularly scheduled programming.

As most of you know, the DVD market has grown by leaps and bounds as collectors get more rabid and regular folks realize that they're collectors when they're forced to buy new shelves for the living room to accommodate their burgeoning DVD library. By accident: that's the perfect way to become a collector, isn't it?

One day you're making fun of your buddy for his little shrine to the digital medium, and the next you're lined up at the local video store waiting for the guy to unlock the gate. You glance at your watch and realize it's 10:01 a.m., and you wonder if the sales associate is aware of his grievous error in judgment. That's a valuable minute wasted that could be spent seeing if the store has bothered to stock the latest incarnation of "Ransom."

Eventually, the gate does open and the flock is allowed to enter. The results are both scary and oddly comforting. You see, I am one of those people, and I am not alone in my quest to feed the DVD monkey on my back.

The studios are getting wise to it, too. The success of New Line Cinema's "The Lord of the Rings" series and the company's tiered DVD release technique reaped instant dividends. As a result, we're seeing a lot of popular films being released by that method. Consumers get a taste with the first release, and then a gigantic DVD collection lands in stores a half-year later. Some studios aren't quite as generous as New Line regarding their tactics, though.

The fact that the hobbit-infused films were going to be released in two editions was public knowledge. Some studios wait until the sales have dried up for a title before launching a sparkling new version with extra-special features, a spiffy new video transfer or a collectible case to hold it. It's called the "Double Dip," and it's the consumers who bite the bait like a famished trout that make it such a cash cow.

DVD has crossed over. It's not a fad, phenomenon or quirky bit of the film culture. It's causing rental stores to rethink their tactics, consumers to plan their budgets around DVD release schedules and casual fans to become collectors. But there's some shifty marketing rhetoric to consider: At what point do DVD buyers say "enough is enough" and bring about a more focused and consumer-friendly way of having home video evolve? There's the ever-present threat of DVD titles reaching the incredibly expensive prices that VHS carried to keep the rental market robust. There's new technology around the corner threatening to unseat the current format.

DVD is coming up to a bizarre crossroads. I hope the consumer benefits, but until then, I'll see you folks in line.

:wavehi:Guilty. I went to Best But yesterday, after work, to pick up The Matrix: Revolutions and The Pink Panther Collection. I also impulse bought Unbreakable. I have a DVD problem.

He's totally right on about there being no reason to buy fullscreen.

fermicat
04-07-2004, 08:43 AM
I saw this today and am also guilty. I love genre boxed sets, and also collect classic SciFi - especially from the 1950's.

Darth Buddha
04-07-2004, 08:44 AM
I've only noticed the difference in some older films... like Spartacus and Lawrence of Arabia.

Some of the shots when I saw it widescreen for the first time seemed almost new, and substantially better.

Maybe editors of more recent films are more cognizant of the DVD market and don't do those kind of foreground/background shots like that now?

fermicat
04-07-2004, 08:46 AM
Oh, and by the way.....

WIDESCREEN is the ONLY way to go!

vhsiv
04-07-2004, 09:39 AM
Originally posted by Darth Buddha
Maybe editors of more recent films are more cognizant of the DVD market and don't do those kind of foreground/background shots like that now? It depends on the film and the director. You saw 'The English Patient', right? Anthony Minghella is very much aware of working in the shadow and scope of David Lean, so yes, there are elaborate vistas on view when they're in the desert, and beautiful shots of the Italian coastline in 'The Talented Mr. Ripley'.

Likewise with Brian DePalma, though he, like Stanley Kubrick, seems to be making fewer and fewer worthwhile films as he gets older.

DePalma, in particular, is one of the biggest cinemagraphic directors out there, using the full 16:9 screen aspect to create his images, doubling them up with split-screens, montages and all the rest. (A good example of DePalma-imitation is Joel Schumacher's 'Phone Booth'. Hackneyed film, good cinematography.)

You've never been frustrated by this if you've never had to watch a DePalma film on HBO...

I think this is a matter of getting the widescreen consciousness to market.

At the other end of the cinema spectrum are the 'point-and-shoot 'ems' of Roger Corman's and Albert Pyun. These guys seldom shoot in widescreen format, and most of the time it doesn't matter becuase their stuff is going straight-to-video anyway. But if HDTV saturates the market, then they too shall have to 'grow up'.

I just wish that more of the big-name cable outfits would figure this out. Turner Classic Movies has, IFC and Sundance have - sometimes even Showtime, but the rest...?

HBO should really try to lead by example - after all, most of their original programming *IS* in letterbox format.

Third EYe
04-07-2004, 04:51 PM
I have 954 DVDs listen in DVD Profiler at the moment and a stack of about 30 or so that I have yet to submit.

I'm past the digital shrine phase.


My DVD Collection (http://www.dvdprofiler.com/mycollection.asp?alias=Third Eye)

I never collected VHS, thought the quality sucked.

Mrelia
04-07-2004, 08:02 PM
I'm just waiting for the good version of "The Pirates of Penzance" to come out on DVD...in WIDESCREEEEEEEEEEN!

ipimen
04-08-2004, 07:43 AM
i try to wait for better releases of dvd's, one thing that helps is my lack of money, since i don't have a lot when i finish saving for something a new version has come out :rollin:

i'm waiting for a trilogy boxset of Matrix (cross my fingers) and i loved Kill Bill, but i won't buy it until i have a chance to buy both movies uncut and uncensored, in full color like the japs got!!! So i'll wait :D

i didn't buy the theatrical release of LOTR, although i found out later that the extras are different than the ones on the extended version...but no matter. I'm hoping for a ultra extended 1 week long release of the three movies with all the extras joined, and this would not hurt a bit, cause i got the collector's editions (with the Argonath and Gollum figures). We all can dream...hehe

BlackThorn
04-08-2004, 07:57 AM
I'm also waiting for the Matrix boxset . . . and it is so hard, because I REALLY want to be able to sit down and do a marathon, watching all three in a row to get the full feel of the story.

My DVD library is small compared to most, mainly due to my lack of funds. All Farscape region 1 DVDs so far released . . . Angel Seasons 1-3, Alias S1, LotR Fellowship and Two Towers extended cuts, and 14 other movies (almost all speculative fiction.) Widescreen on all if available. That's it for now.

When I have breathing room in the financial area . . . heaven help me, I'm going on a binge. Deep Discount DVD will be getting massive orders from me -- they need a truck just for my deliveries. And by then, I'll need a very large plasma screen to watch them all on and a kick as stereo system. <insert evil laugh here> Call me an addict without enough cash to fund my addiction properly.

fermicat
04-08-2004, 10:33 AM
I put Farscape Season 1 and 2 boxed sets on my birthday wish list. I have them on VHS, but would like to have DVDs and then use the videotapes to Scape my friends and family.

I just got Dr. Strangelove. Great flick. Dark. Funny.

BlackThorn
04-08-2004, 10:53 AM
I hope you get them, fermicat. I have most of the episodes on VHS (taped from Skiffy with the commercials cut out,) and I have to say the quality on the DVDs is soooo nice. Crystal clear picture with incredibly vibrant color. :love:

*keeps her fingers crossed for fermicat*

stellar
04-08-2004, 02:53 PM
Originally posted by Third EYe
I have 954 DVDs listen in DVD Profiler at the moment and a stack of about 30 or so that I have yet to submit.

I'm past the digital shrine phase.


My DVD Collection (http://www.dvdprofiler.com/mycollection.asp?alias=Third Eye)

I never collected VHS, thought the quality sucked.

This website is awesome. I highly suggest it to all scapers here if for nothing else than to establish a database of DVD tastes. Plus it's frelling cool.

My DVD collection. (http://www.dvdprofiler.com/mycollection.asp?alias=Stellar)

I only have 106, but some of those are collections, e.g. Alien Quadrilogy, Back to the Future Trilogy, etc.

I do have a moderate VHS collection... I couldn't see into the future after all. Some of those are pretty good quality tapes too, such as my Blade Runner Directors cut and my Dark Crystal amongst others.

Edited to add: The downloadable version is great for statistics. The total suggested retail price for my collection is $3,643.67.

vhsiv
04-08-2004, 03:23 PM
What's the purpose of this database of program at DVDProfiler.com?

What's the point of compiling all this information? Is it for the users or the MPAA? I don't quite get it...

stellar
04-08-2004, 03:31 PM
Because it's fun.

Check it out! (http://www.watchfarscape.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&postid=420742#post420742) :aok:

Third EYe
04-08-2004, 04:42 PM
I use the DVD Profiler in order to keep track of what I own, and for others to see.

Why do I want other people to see my collection? Maybe they want to surprise me with a gift, it has a wish list as well. I also use it when I invite others over to watch a movie, they can view the list for a few days prior to comming over.


...and it's fun

stellar
04-08-2004, 04:50 PM
Plus you can judge people and critique them on their DVDs. Take the Arrival/Arrival 2 DVD on my list. I deserve some judgement on that one.

Third EYe
04-08-2004, 04:57 PM
Oh, I always buy the cheap DVDs. You show me a 5 dollar bin and I dive in.

Antrobus
04-08-2004, 05:04 PM
I'm afraid I'm another that's gotten hooked. I have about 20 DVDs that I haven't even opened yet! Working evenings is not compatible with watching DVDs!

If they'd only release (or rerelease) some of the good movies on DVD. I get annoyed when Oscar winners such as Howard's End is no longer available on DVD and one has to pay $75-100 for a used copy.

My three most favorite movies are not available on DVD. "Dreamchild" (sceenplay by Dennis Potter, creatures by Henson), "The Trip To Bountiful" ( Geraldine Page won a best actress Oscar for this in 1985) and "The Dead" ( John Huston's final film and starring daughter Anjelica - devastating movie)

Third EYe
04-08-2004, 05:19 PM
Originally posted by BlackThorn
I'm also waiting for the Matrix boxset . . . and it is so hard, because I REALLY want to be able to sit down and do a marathon, watching all three in a row to get the full feel of the story.



I can't wait on boxsets, not only that, the extras are always diferent. The Matrix boxset probably won't come out for quite some time.

You can always hit the library and try your luck there, you never know when you may see them all on the shelf at the same time.

fermicat
04-09-2004, 08:55 AM
Originally posted by Third EYe
Oh, I always buy the cheap DVDs. You show me a 5 dollar bin and I dive in.

My grandfather has been doing this, but unfortunately he gets a lot of really crappy movies this way....