PDA

View Full Version : Pattern Emerges in Deadly Teen Auto Accidents


AgentSun
03-01-2005, 12:59 PM
wow. just...wow.

Source (http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=677&e=24&u=/usatoday/20050301/bs_usatoday/deadlyteenautocrashesshowapattern)

Deadly teen auto crashes show a pattern

Tue Mar 1, 8:06 AM ET

By Jayne O'Donnell, USA TODAY

It was a double date like countless others: Two teenage girls and their teenage boyfriends, with plans to see a movie on a summer night.

But this one ended in grief. Sixteen-year-old Gerald Miller swerved his sport-utility vehicle to miss a car stalled on Interstate 95. The SUV, traveling about 78 mph, rolled five times. The boys were injured. The girls - Casey Hersch, 16, and Lauren Gorham, 15 - were thrown from the SUV and died.

To many who knew the victims, the crash seemed like a cruel act of fate, a freak tragedy beyond anyone's control. But it fit a common formula for teen deaths on the USA's roadways: Put a 16-year-old boy at the wheel of an SUV. Add two or three teens, including at least one other boy. Send them out at night. Finally, let them travel fast - and unbelted.

Those common factors emerged when USA TODAY examined all the deadly crashes involving 16-to-19-year-old drivers in 2003. About 3,500 teenagers died in teen-driven vehicles in the USA that year - a death toll that tops that of any disease or injury for teens. The South proved to be the deadliest region.

More than two-thirds of fatal single-vehicle teen crashes involved nighttime driving or at least one passenger age 16 to 19. Nearly three-fourths of the drivers in those crashes were male. And 16-year-old drivers were the riskiest of all. Their rate of involvement in fatal crashes was nearly five times that of drivers ages 20 and older, according to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (news - web sites).

Teen brains not developed

New medical research helps explain why. The part of the brain that weighs risks and controls impulsive behavior isn't fully developed until about age 25, according to the National Institutes of Health (news - web sites). Some state legislators and safety activists question whether 16-year-olds should be licensed to drive.

Sixteen-year-olds are far worse drivers than 17-, 18- or 19-year-olds, statistics show. Tellingly, New Jersey, which has long barred 16-year-olds from having unrestricted driver's licenses, for years has had one of the lowest teen fatality rates in the USA.

Other jurisdictions, too, have found the only sure way to cut the teen death toll is to limit unsupervised driving by 16-year-olds. Seven states and the District of Columbia don't give unrestricted licenses to anyone under 18. In Britain and Germany, teens can't drive until ages 17 and 18, respectively.

Rules that restrict driving at 16 have clearly had a positive effect, the insurance institute says. As the proportion of 16-year-olds in the USA with driver's licenses has declined from a decade ago, so has the proportion of 16-year-olds involved in fatal crashes. But the rate among those who are licensed has shown no improvement.

On an average day in the USA, 10 teenagers are killed in teen-driven vehicles. Some days are far worse. Crashes that occurred on one of the deadliest days of 2003 - Nov. 1 - killed 26 teens.

The death toll could swell in coming years. A record 17.5 million teens will be eligible to drive once the peak of the "baby boomlet" hits driving age by the end of this decade - 1.3 million more than were eligible in 2000.

Horrific as teenage deaths are, the collective response from their families is often one of grim acceptance. Jeffrey Runge, a former emergency room doctor who's now head of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (news - web sites), shudders to recall how some parents reacted to hearing their teens had just died in a crash.

"It was amazing how many people would say, 'I guess it was just his time,' " Runge says.

Runge acknowledges that safety advocates have failed to adequately publicize what's known about why teens die in crashes. State laws often don't restrict behavior that's linked to many teen fatalities.

Nearly all states have some form of "graduated licensing" programs that limit driving privileges for new teenage drivers. In some states, the rules restrict whom teens can transport and when they can drive. Teen fatalities have declined in states with the programs, according to a new report by the insurance institute.

But the institute and other safety experts note that despite those programs, thousands of teens are still being killed on the roads. The reason, they say: Graduated licensing rules are poorly enforced and often riddled with loopholes.

When risks rise

A review of crash statistics finds clear patterns. The risk to teen lives rises when:

•A 16-year-old is at the wheel. Along with their higher rate of involvement in fatal crashes, 16-year-olds make driving errors, exceed speed limits, run off roads and roll their vehicles over at higher rates than do older drivers involved in fatal crashes.

"They're the youngest, so they are all inexperienced at that age," says Allan Williams, the institute's former chief scientist. "They're pushing the limits, trying out new things ... and they don't really have the controls over risk-taking in terms of judgment and decision-making."

•They're riding with other teens. Forty percent of 16-year-old drivers involved in deadly single-vehicle crashes in 2003 had one or more teen passengers. Teens' risk of dying nearly doubles with the addition of one male passenger, the insurance institute says. It more than doubles with two or more young men in the car.

Jackie Swanson, 18, had two passengers - her 16-year-old cousin, Thomas, and a 17-year-old friend, James Newton - and was driving about 90 mph when she lost control of a Firebird convertible in a 2003 Louisiana crash. Swanson struck another car, scaled a guardrail and went airborne across several lanes of traffic. The three unbelted teens were ejected and killed.

Thomas Swanson, Thomas' father and Jackie's uncle, says the loss forced him to relapse temporarily into cocaine addiction. "I was trying to bury the deaths with the drugs," Swanson says.

•They're in teen-driven cars after dark. Teen drivers are three times as likely as drivers 20 and older to be involved in fatal crashes between 9 p.m. and 6 a.m., the institute says, and 16-year-olds die at night at twice the rate as in the daytime. It's harder to see at night, so it's harder to react quickly to obstacles. Inexperienced drivers are more vulnerable to making errors after dark.

Jennifer McElmurray, of Evans, Ga., who turned 16 in February 2003, was driving that June when she lost control of her car and hit a stand of trees. Her car was engulfed in flames. McElmurray survived the crash, but her two male passengers, ages 16 and 17, died. The nighttime curfew for new drivers was midnight; the sheriff was called to the scene at 11:56 p.m.

•The young driver loses control. Driver error is involved in 77% of fatal crashes involving 16-year-old drivers but in less than 60% of crashes with drivers 20 and older.

About a third of all 16-year-old drivers and a quarter of 17-to-19-year-old drivers involved in fatal crashes rolled their vehicles. Rollovers often occur when a driver overcorrects and runs off the road. Inexperienced teens are most likely to do so.

On a July night in 2003, Jessie Bell, 16, was following a car driven by her boyfriend on a Missouri highway with a 65-mph speed limit when she lost control. The vehicle rolled into a ditch, and she died.

•They're in an unsuitable vehicle. Because they're in the age group most likely to be involved in a crash, teensshould occupy vehicles least likely to roll and most protective when they crash, highway safety experts say. Yet, teens often wind up in small cars, which are especially vulnerable when hit by larger vehicles, or in SUVs, which are more prone to roll over.

Two years ago, Runge caused a stir when he noted he would never let his inexperienced teens drive a vehicle with a two-star (out of five) rollover rating from the safety administration. Only SUVs and pickups score that low in the ratings.

Terry Khristian Rider, 16, died after he was partly ejected from the GMC SUV he was driving in a 2003 crash in Orangeburg, S.C. His uncle, John Rider, says Terry borrowed the vehicle to drive his girlfriend home before midnight. "Those things are kind of top-heavy, and it doesn't take a whole lot of correcting to roll them," Rider says. "I think it's wrong for people to let kids drive (SUVs)."

•They drive in more dangerous regions.Eight of the 10 states with the highest teen-driver fatal crash-involvement rates are in the South. Highway safety officials from Southern states, including Alabama, Louisiana and Mississippi, say lax enforcement of speeding or alcohol laws and many rural, tree-lined roads that provide little margin for error make their states deadlier for young drivers.

Kim Proctor, Mississippi's highway safety chief, blames weak seat-belt laws in her state, Florida and Kentucky and difficulty in getting many pickup drivers and minorities to buckle up.

Parents have no idea

Kathy Schaefer, the mother of Florida crash victim Casey Hersch, and Melissa Herberz, Lauren Gorham's mother, had no idea of the odds their daughters were facing the July night they were killed.

"I was a very controlling parent," Schaefer says. "But I never thought my child would be killed in a car."

To this day, Schaefer frequently stays in her bedroom all day, mourning the loss of her only child.

The mothers didn't know that the vehicle their daughters were in at the time - a Ford Explorer Sport Trac SUV with a pickup bed - had earned a low two-star government rollover rating. Nor did they recognize the risk the girls faced with a 16-year-old boy driving several passengers. Male teen drivers are about 75% more likely than female teen drivers to be involved in fatal crashes, the insurance institute says.

Florida had the fourth-worst teen fatal-crash rate in 2003. It isn't among the 28 states that restrict how many passengers 16-year-old-drivers can have, and it's one of 30 states that forbid police to stop drivers solely for not wearing safety belts; none of the teens was belted.

Florida does have an 11 p.m. driving curfew for 16- and 17-year-old drivers. The crash occurred just after 9 p.m.

Highway safety officials around the USA complain that many state legislators, pressured by parents, have refused to tighten laws to bar teens from driving at night or from having teen passengers, despite clear evidence those factors sharply raise the risk of teen deaths.

Safety officials note that of the 38 states with nighttime driving restrictions, more than half don't start those restrictions until at least midnight - when, they say, most younger teens are not out.

"There's so much research that has shown (graduated licensing) makes a huge difference that we have been trying almost desperately to get (our law) upgraded," says Alabama traffic safety chief Rhonda Pines. Alabama lets 16-year-olds drive after midnight if they're returning from a hunting or fishing trip and have their parents' consent. The state also lets 16-year-olds have up to three teen passengers, in addition to family members.

There are also regional disparities in how alcohol and speeding prohibitions are treated. In Mississippi, where fatalities often occur on tree-lined roads, only one county authorizes sheriffs to use radar guns. Speeding laws are seldom enforced on those roads, Proctor says.

Some states will license even teens who got speeding tickets while driving with a learner's permit.

James Champagne, chairman of the national Governors Highway Safety Association, laments what he calls a casual attitude toward alcohol abuse in his home state of Louisiana. Yet Champagne, a former state police lieutenant colonel, notes it isn't easy to enforce graduated licensing. "Police will look at it as a priority depending on what importance the public puts on it," says Champagne, the Louisiana governor's highway safety director.

Those who advocate graduated licensing say the laws assume parents will enforce them. But interviews with safety officials and crash reports suggest parents often let teens skirt the laws, don't know the rules or aren't aware their kids are driving. The parents of at least two teens killed in 2003 car crashes thought their kids were washing, not driving, the car.

"We don't have police officers on every corner," Champagne says. "Too many parents expect the police to be the parent."

Hard to move forward

Gayle Bell was doing everything that seemed appropriate for a parent when Jessie died in her crash. But she no longer thinks 16-year-olds are old enough to drive. Jessie was ejected from her Chevrolet Cavalier coupe in El Dorado Springs, Mo. Bell says the grieving "melts your body down."

Jessie got her license in March 2003 and her car three months later. She was driving the next month, at night, when she crashed.

"Really, the only way to get the experience is to go out and drive," Bell says. "If I had to swerve, I would know how to do it. Jessie really didn't."

Marvin Zuckerman, a psychologist and former professor at the University of Delaware, for years has studied another reason, beyond inexperience and immaturity, why teens tend to be risky drivers. He calls it "sensation seeking."

In driving terms, it's a desire to derive a thrill from the experience. Zuckerman doesn't think full licenses should be awarded until age 21. His research has found that the desire to take risks and act impulsively peaks around age 19 or 20. "It's no coincidence the peak accident rates are in those age ranges," Zuckerman says.

James Avello, 18, Hersch's former boyfriend, who recovered from injuries he suffered in the crash, says the loss of their friends has had little effect on the driving of his classmates at Chaminade-Madonna (news - web sites) College Preparatory School. Avello sold his SUV in favor of a less rollover-prone Mazda Millenia sedan. But many teens, he says, drive their own, often-sporty, cars to school on major highways.

Gerald Miller, 18, the driver in the crash, transferred to another high school after enduring death threats from classmates who blamed him for the deaths, says his mother, Geralyn. She says her son needed intensive therapy.

On the 8th of every month, Schaefer visits the spot on I-95 where her daughter was killed on July 8, 2003. It's marked with an Eeyore, Winnie the Pooh's slow but lovable donkey sidekick. Her daughter's volleyball coach gave her that name during a lackluster performance, and it stuck.

After the crash, Casey Hersch's mother and stepfather moved out of the family home to try to escape their anguish. The family still owns the home, now unoccupied. Casey's bedroom, filled with Eeyores, remains untouched. Schaefer still runs the girl's volleyball team concession and goes to school soccer games. Those are about the only commitments in life that she keeps.

"A mother's life is all about being devoted to her child," says Schaefer, who chose laughter as her cell phone ring tone because she so seldom hears it anymore. "One crazy night took everything away."


i drive an SUV and i KNOW my car has certain weaknesses. i found it absolutely apalling that parents really do think that a car has more to do with driving safety than the driver does. just because my car happens to have a higher rollover rate doesn't necessarily mean that it will guarantee an accident. bad driving causes accidents. an SUV can get into an accident just as much as a sedan. the difference is in who is driving and how well they were driving. i think oftentimes 16-19 year olds have too much freedom in their system...ooh, new license, ooh the new experience of a car. ooh, freedom to go wherever i choose. that's why there's more focus on getting out than being safe. they just want to get out of the house without the parents and that means sometimes that drivers get distracted.

my parents were always very strict with me being in the cars of teen drivers. they were very strict until i started driving myself and they just had to let go...plus they had raised me up right. they knew i was a good judge of who was a good driver or not. i'm 21 now and i'm a good driver. i know what i'm doing when i'm behind the wheel of my car and very rarely do i ever drive anyone else's car, mostly because most of the people i know drive small cars and i have the SUV. i think parents have responsibility to make sure their kids are safe...even if it means that laying down a few rules. my parents did and i'm glad they did.

i also really have to wonder whether these parents really think that their kids are going to be perfectly okay when they're in a car with a bunch of friends. i mean, come on. be serious here. a bunch of teens in one car...this is going to be loud, chaotic and most likely distracting. i know that when ihave a bunch of people in the car and i'm trying to drive, it's very distracting when they're all yelling, so when people are in my car, they know that they can't be loud. these parents should know better than to really believe that kids are absolutely fine when they're in big groups like that.

StephX
03-01-2005, 01:25 PM
I was a good driver when I was 16 even with a few friends with me. Hmmm... of course, I'm female, learned to drive at 14, and, never could stand the feeling of a moving car without a seatbelt. ;)

AgentSun
03-01-2005, 01:30 PM
i think it's a matter of how much freedom you are given behind the wheel of a car, plus how much time was invested on training and the attention that was given to educate the driver on the functionings of a car.

who45
03-01-2005, 02:04 PM
I remember in my junior year of high school 4 people were killed in 4 different car accidents, all in that same year. One of those killed had been a really close friend of mine that I had known since I was seven. Fortunatly, he had been driving alone in the car. He was going way too fast, lost control and hit a tree. The other 3 accidents happened basicaly the same way...the driver...a teenager...driving too fast because they felt they knew the road really well since they traveled on it each day. Since then, every year around where I live, there are at least 2 or 3 teenagers that are killed because they are out at night driving too fast. I remember after my friend was killed a lot of other students confessed that they too would drive way above the speed limit if they were driving on a road that they traveled day in and day out.They felt that they knew the road well so they were safe to drive that fast....wrong! And the sad thing is, it is still happening around here. I think a lot of teenagers don't think of what can happen to them behind the wheel and some of the parents do not take time to teach their kids the dangers of driving.

BrowderChick
03-01-2005, 04:13 PM
NYS Driving Laws are updating all the time. All of them now focused on teen drivers. Also in NYS there is a seatbelt law. Even if they see you drive by without it on, you are given a ticket of $150 or more. There is no way out of this ticket no matter how you plead.

Judith
03-01-2005, 04:16 PM
my parents were always very strict with me being in the cars of teen drivers. they were very strict until i started driving myself and they just had to let go...plus they had raised me up right. they knew i was a good judge of who was a good driver or not. i'm 21 now and i'm a good driver. i know what i'm doing when i'm behind the wheel of my car and very rarely do i ever drive anyone else's car, mostly because most of the people i know drive small cars and i have the SUV. i think parents have responsibility to make sure their kids are safe...even if it means that laying down a few rules. my parents did and i'm glad they did.




Wow, my parents wouldn't let me drive with other teenagers either. I hated them for it, and I got grounded more than once for being caught in another kid's car.

This is one of those humbling "maybe my parents were right" moments.

arthurfrdent
03-01-2005, 04:37 PM
yeah, read that article again. what did it constantly say?

NOT WEARING SEATBELT

oh really?

I dunno I could go off on a rant here but to what effect? I learned to drive way early, but 24 years ago when I was 16 a lot fewer teens had their OWN cars. They had to borrow so there was a lot more involvement by parents who were loaning their cars out.

Now as far as SUV's go, a lot of people are under the misunderstanding that they are safer...uh NO. They respond much worse to driver input and they are generally not forgiving. What someone inexperienced needs is forgiving. Couple that with their terrible crash records... It is very difficult to find one that isn't bad in a crash... They are often older, hi milage and some parts especially suspension wear out, but don't get replaced.

Doesn't matter though, if you don't wear a seatbelt, you're probably going to die.

The other thing I hate about these types of reports is they don't give the whole story. What percentage of non-fatalities are rollovers? Are single vehicle? By age? By sex? And in lessening degree till just fender bender? It's pretty bad... but there must be reasons that it SEEMS [and may not be] worse now.

Legislation to make it harder to get a license is no substuitute for teaching people HOW to drive, and that is one thing in the US we are terrible at...mostly because it's not well funded/nobody thinks it's needed. You can't make a teen seek less thrills, but you might teach them what to do in a bad situation, SO THEY DONT CRASH.

OI. AFD

Erp
03-01-2005, 06:08 PM
Right on and great discussion.
The "ERP" actually stands for ER Physician.
I can add a few points, though you guys have basically made lots of good ones already.
The issue with unbelted persons in rollovers is the rate at which ejections occur. As you would logically expect, fatalities are higher when victims are ejected. 15 passenger vans are also deadly in rollover, because passengers often don't buckle up and the windows tend to pop out and people get strewn all over the highway. I was personally in a big Ford van with captain's chairs that rolled, and two of the unbelted passengers died. I was belted and only broke my neck.
My kids were educated as to the dangers of driving by listening to horror stories at the dinner table. That's a good way to do it.

Clarsax
03-01-2005, 07:01 PM
My parents were really strict when it came to driving and I guess it was a good thing. I wasn't allowed to drive large cars, to drive with friends in the car for the first six months, or go anywhere outside town limits without special permission. Also, I didn't in areas with speed limits above 45, and I only rode as a passenger in friends' cars that my parents approved of. I had to take a lot of classes and practices with instructors and they drilled it into my head to always wear a seatbelt with thier accident horror stories. After reading this article, I'm glad they did.

Boron
03-01-2005, 07:22 PM
When I was about 14, the thing to do, was find someone old enough to drive, and with a car, and go out and make a circuit of hangouts. The first fatal car wreck I ever saw occurred about that time. A carload of girls came to a "T" intersection facing an empty field with ONE tree in it. They went airborne and hit that one tree. I think one was dead and another was lying there screaming. It made an impression. I still took chances when I got my own license tho. Seatbelts will save your life. I will personally testify to that. Remember it.

AgentSun
03-01-2005, 08:00 PM
seatbelts save lives and what is a little bit more safety?

what really annoys me sometimes are the teens who think they can just sit at the light and not pay attention to anything. they are the ones who get distracted because they oftentimes have friends with them. i mean, i've had my fair share of adventures with my friends, but they were hardly dangerous and we were all buckled in.

in fact, i had one friend who refuses to start the car unless everyone is buckled in. good boy.

who45
03-01-2005, 08:03 PM
...in fact, i had one friend who refuses to start the car unless everyone is buckled in. good boy. I do the same, if anyone wants to ride with me they have to wear a seatbelt or my car doesn't move.

AgentSun
03-01-2005, 08:06 PM
i make it a rule to never have more than i can fit into my car. i'm okay with the way i drive when i'm alone but i get extremely cautious and strict when people are in my car...after all, i'm responsible for them too. even though i have an SUV, i don't take more than 4 passengers in my car, 5 if they're all girls (cause they can fit better)...when i first got to college in 2003, a bunch of girls i hung out with would all want to cram into my car. it was unnerving because there were too many and a few of them would sit on the others' laps or they would climb into the trunk. that was extremely unnerving because they didn't have seatbelts and i really did not want to get pulled over for something like that.

needless to say, they are not my friends anymore. they got very snooty about my rules and my insistance that they take a second vehicle.

StephX
03-01-2005, 08:11 PM
Good for you AgentSun.
They're really not your friends if they won't follow your rules in your car anyway.

RustySlinky
03-01-2005, 10:19 PM
A few years back one of my uncles bought his daughter a new Pontiac Firebird.
While she thought he was just being an awesome dad, he privately said later that he didn't approve of the lighter-weight hondas, and felt better about her having an full 8 cylinder engine in-front to cushion against head-on collisions. :)

Judith
03-01-2005, 10:32 PM
I always wear a seltbelt. No exceptions.

Because I'm too paranoid that the ONE time I don't wear one will be the ONE time I get in a crash.

AgentSun
03-01-2005, 10:35 PM
i'm a firm paranoid about irony.

BrowderChick
03-01-2005, 10:36 PM
The only thing that freaks me out is if I hit a pothole and the airbag opens.

AgentSun
03-01-2005, 10:43 PM
wow. my airbags have never popped open when i hit a pothole. might be that my car is so big. i don't know.

Mrelia
03-02-2005, 09:48 AM
I know there are teens out there who would hate my gut for saying this, but I am so glad that there are systems out there now that allow parents to monitor how their children have been driving. I also like the systems that make the reminder beeps if the car goes too far over the speed limit in its system. I allow the driver to speed up if they are in a stituation that requires additional speed, but doesn't allow habitual speeding.

sny
03-02-2005, 01:30 PM
Graduated licensiing is a good idea, to me. Not every parent or kid is going to be responsible enough to police or honestly evaluate their driving experience and skills without the threat of a ticket. It's not a cure-all, but it sure helps. And definitely, seatbelts save lives. I know someone who was an EMT, and he once said he only ever cut one dead body out of a seatbelt in more than 30 years of runs. He pulled plenty of living, breathing people from them. I'm all for seatbelt laws, too.

This whole mythology about SUVs (or fill in the vehicle of choice) being so much "safer" has probably led to a lot of reckless driving, I think. A vehicle, any vehicle, is only as safe as the driver operating it, for the most part. Some people who drive/buy their children SUVs seem to think it's the equivalent of buying them a tank and therefore insulates them from any dangers or responsibility to drive decently. They don't take into account that SUVs are a lot more dangerous to other, smaller vehicles, too. I see a lot of people who treat their SUVs like they are Sherman tanks and can take any crap driving you throw at them, without a thought about the other vehicles on the road. And most of them aren't teens, either. Thankfully, it's only a small minority that do that.

I see a whooooole lot of bunged up SUVs every year that are sitting in the emergency lane or the ditch because the driver thinks "I have 4-wheel drive and can go on the snow and ice = I can stop on a dime on the snow and ice". Or "I have a big vehicle, so I have a right to more than my fair share of the road".

I kind of did my own graduated licensing as a teen. I kept my permit for a year before I went to get my license. I was always very aware that having a license meant I was allowed to operate a ton of metal that could become a death machine if wielded improperly. Therefore, I wasn't too eager to get my license and be solely responsible for that kind of power.

AgentSun
03-02-2005, 02:32 PM
i had my license and waited a year before i really actually learned how to drive. i think in virginia we have to go through driver's ed, so i went and did the class but when we had to do behind the wheel stuff, it sucked so much for me cause the teacher was annoying and intimidating and threw me out onto the beltway when it was my first time driving!

when i got my license i didn't have a car and it was just not worth it for me to ask and ask if i could drive the car. both my parents work and need vehicles and such. so when i did get my own car (my mom's old car) my dad sat me behind the wheel and taught me how to drive as the world drives...which basically means, "if someone is going too fast, don't follow. if someone is going too slow, feel free to safely pass them" and my dad taught me the rights and wrongs of things you couldn't learn in books. it helped a lot cause i wasn't nervous around my dad and it was in a car i was comfortable being in.

oh and here's an article from washingtonpost.com that i found today.

washingtonpost.com
Parents Hand Out Keys, and a Monitoring Device

By Elizabeth Williamson
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, March 2, 2005; Page A01

When Ben Ellison, 15, gets his driver's license next month, he dreams of driving a midnight blue, low-riding Honda with monster horsepower, a performance exhaust system and, inside, blue neon rods that glow with each bass beat from the stereo.

Instead, he'll drive a Mazda, with a computer chip that spies on every ride.

"If I wasn't into tuning my car, I think maybe this wouldn't have happened," Ben said last week, swinging his Mazda 626 onto a highway in Easton, Md., on a practice drive as he -- and the monitor -- noted his speed.

"It's pretty cool technology and all," he said, glancing at the matchbook-size device plugged into the steering column near the knees of his cargo pants. "But after a while, this is going to be so annoying."

Figuring their children are better off annoyed than dead, parents have opened a new front in the battle to lower teenagers' accident rates. Using technology employed by truck fleets to monitor drivers, families are spending as much as $2,500 for microcomputers and "black boxes" that feed speed and braking data into a home computer; cockpit video cameras; Global Positioning System devices that track teenagers through their cell phones; and lower-tech surveillance, such as the Tell-My-Mom.com bumper sticker.

"No one's done a study yet that shows these new methods work," said Ronald Knipling, a research scientist at the Virginia Tech Transportation Institute who has led a research forum on electronic monitoring. "But it's a very promising idea."

Ben voiced the reaction of many teens. "My friends," he said, turning his car toward home, "think it's whack."

Before his practice drive last week, Ben sat in the living room of his family's waterfront house on the Eastern Shore hearing, one more time, why CarChip is a good idea.

"It's not that I'm worried about your skills. . . . I'm worried about your judgment, which comes as you get older," said his stepfather, Phil Bowman, who bought the $140 device. "It's a way to prove your ability to be out there on your own."

Bowman, originally from Bethesda, said that when he was young, he got so many speeding tickets that his license was suspended.

"But I don't want to be judged by your mistakes," Ben replied.

Ben's mother, Susan Schauer, said that when she can't be in the passenger seat, "you know there's a device that's paying attention."

"I feel old enough to start gaining some privacy," Ben said.

"I don't think how you drive is private," his stepfather responded.

They'll remove the CarChip, they've agreed, when Ben is 18.

The family's conversation is at the heart of monitoring systems' effectiveness, said Susan Ferguson, senior vice president for research at the Arlington-based Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.

"When people know they're being monitored, they can change their behavior," she said. "Assuming we had a study that said, 'Whoa, this can make a difference in crash rates,' we still have to ask: Are the parents willing to be more involved?"

Experience with the new systems and new research point to old-fashioned parental communication as the best way to instill good driving habits. In a National Institute of Child Health and Human Development study released last week, parents of 16-year-olds reviewed newsletters and a video with facts about risky practices, then drew up written agreements spelling out consequences for engaging in each bad habit. The limits, researchers found, stayed in place up to a year, the riskiest time for young drivers.

"Teens whose parents had restrictions on their initial driving experience reported engaging in less risky driving later on," said Bruce Simons-Morton, a research chief at the institute and the study's lead author. "There is a use for electronic monitoring devices. But there's a tendency for parents to be a little more passive than they should be."

Joanne Devens agrees. Harder than watching a video of the accident her daughter Stephanie had, she said, was establishing consequences for Stephanie's careless driving.

Devens, of Mankato, Minn., had a camera installed in Stephanie's Saturn last year as part of a 26-week trial involving a dozen Minnesota high school students, organized by the Mayo Clinic. Mounted near the rearview mirror, it filmed Stephanie, then 16, without her seat belt, chatting on the phone, joking with passengers, fiddling with the radio.

It wasn't long before the camera captured the car flying off a curve into a snowy ditch. "She was dialing her cell phone," Joanne Devens said. She saw her daughter's terrified face and heard "this blood-chilling scream," Devens said. "Thankfully, she didn't get hurt."

Was she punished?

"Yes and no. . . . I kind of gave in," she said.

Though the camera was designed to monitor truck drivers, parents have begun ordering the $1,400 device, inspiring its manufacturer to plan a consumer version, said Rusty Weiss, director of product management for DriveCam Video Systems of San Diego.

During the trial, students' near misses, swerves and hard braking that trigger the camera dropped from 24 a week to nearly zero, he said. Seat-belt use rose from one-third of students to nearly all.

The camera has helped reduce truckers' accident rates as much as 70 percent, but, Weiss said, "there has to be somebody judging the performance."

Devens has begun to curtail her daughter's driving privileges for carrying other teens in the car and not wearing a seat belt. But she acknowledged she could do more. "I think parents have to be stronger than I was and have more consequences," she said.

Ben Ellison, after his drive past the seafood shacks and rainbow Victorians of Easton, returned to his parents' house and removed the CarChip. "Let's see how you did," Bowman said, plugging the CarChip into a cable linked to his computer. A spiky, black-and-white graph appeared, showing speed and braking patterns. "You went 55 here."

"The speed limit!" Ben said. Bowman scanned the graph: no red lines indicating risky driving behavior. "You passed, Ben," he said.

"If I have to go through this every day, I swear to God I'll go to my room and cry," Ben replied.

"But this is what a caring parent would do," his mother said.

"Or a spy," Ben said. "Put yourself in my shoes."

"Maybe I can't do that anymore," his mother said. Partly, she said, because of Megan Batdorf. Tall and athletic, a 16-year-old classmate of Ben's, she took him for a ride in her Corvette in December. Days later, driving to visit another friend, she hit a truck and was killed.

"Maybe he's going to be mad," Schauer said, looking at her son. "But I just can't hand the keys over and say, 'Off you go.' "

sny
03-02-2005, 03:18 PM
Ben voiced the reaction of many teens. "My friends," he said, turning his car toward home, "think it's whack."

And my reaction as a parent would be "Tough shiznit."

It wasn't long before the camera captured the car flying off a curve into a snowy ditch. "She was dialing her cell phone," Joanne Devens said. She saw her daughter's terrified face and heard "this blood-chilling scream," Devens said. "Thankfully, she didn't get hurt."

Was she punished?

"Yes and no. . . . I kind of gave in," she said.

Beg pardon? So... she only gets grounded for poor driving if she gets killed? Or does killing other people because she's yakking on her cell phone get a pass, too?

AgentSun
03-02-2005, 03:50 PM
yeah i found the mother to be absolutely apalling too. she didn't do anything to her daughter after she almost got killed? i mean, come on! she was doing 3 things all at once!

on my phone i have voice dial and i make full use of it. saying "dad" into the phone is a lot easier than flipping through my phonebook. i have a lot of numbers in my book, i don't necessarily have the time or attention to find the specific button i want and push it so it'll get to the right letter of the alphabet, and then scroll down to the right entry.

i don't answer my phone unless i'm stopped or otherwise on a straight road. i will actually go "hold on" and put down the phone if i'm about to make a turn. and i have a headset that i use so i don't have to hold the phone. my parents didn't impose this on me, i did. i found quickly that me holding a phone while driving a very heavy car was not the best idea. so i got a headset and my phone sits nicely in my cupholder so it doesn't slide around everywhere.

i think the boy in this case was just extremely annoying and he was a total brat. if he thinks this is annoying, i suppose his parents should just hand him keys, let him get himself killed, and then he won't have to worry about being monitored. the article plainly states that he had tons of traffic tickets...you don't just rack those up doing nothing, you know?

sny
03-02-2005, 11:37 PM
the article plainly states that he had tons of traffic tickets...you don't just rack those up doing nothing, you know?

I believe that was referring to the stepdad.

"Bowman, originally from Bethesda, said that when he was young, he got so many speeding tickets that his license was suspended."

If I read the article correctly, the boy, whose last name is Ellison, doesn't even have his license yet, therefore he couldn't have already gotten so many tickets that his license was suspended. Unless he's mastered time travel. In which case, he can afford to buy his own car without a monitoring device.


"But I don't want to be judged by your mistakes," Ben replied.
"I feel old enough to start gaining some privacy," Ben said.


Oh, poor Ben! The angst! All ready to be out there on his own, in his impractical, expensive dream machine, with the unaffordable insurance, making all his own mistakes without The Man breathing down his neck, yet his parent and step-parent insist on caring about him enough to make sure he's safe and not endangering lives and to provide him a car... How dare they! How... whack.

Seriously, I agree with the stepdad. How you drive is not a private matter. No matter what your age. That's why we have, y'know, laws and stuff about how you can drive. And legal consequences for not driving safely. If driving were a privacy issue, the police wouldn't hand out tickets and other drivers wouldn't be endangered by loonies on the road. Private kind of implies that what you do doesn't have a direct effect on others. Driving like a nut does.

I also would be willing to bet if Ben got an expensive speeding ticket, he wouldn't be so concerned about his privacy that he wouldn't be asking said parents to pay the fine for him.

AgentSun
03-02-2005, 11:44 PM
my bad then.

i think there should be more regulation for the elderly too. but that's another issue.

i look at teens now and even though we're not so different in age, they are less equipped to handle a car than someone who has even had one year of experience. they are just ill equipped to drive safely...rules and laws go flying out of their minds and they really can't simply believe that bad things can happen to them.

my first time driving by myself i almost got into a car accident. the reason i didn't was because i remembered something my dad taught me to do.

scrape_medic
03-15-2005, 01:30 AM
Now as far as SUV's go, a lot of people are under the misunderstanding that they are safer...uh NO. They respond much worse to driver input and they are generally not forgiving. What someone inexperienced needs is forgiving. Couple that with their terrible crash records... It is very difficult to find one that isn't bad in a crash... They are often older, hi milage and some parts especially suspension wear out, but don't get replaced.

Exactly....

The only car that I have ever seen roll and has left the passenger compartment fully protected is a Porshe Boxter. (Rolled at 120mph went off the road, through a fence and 40ft of small trees!) The only injury the two occupants had was one broken arm.

Every other vehicle has left the passenger compartment impacted to some degree, and SUV or similar have a lot of room to go bouncing around in if you are not weraing you seatbelt.