PDA

View Full Version : Distant "planet" captured on film


malachilenomade
04-06-2005, 09:20 AM
Linky goodness (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/4408187.stm)

Telescopes see 'distant planet'

The new "planet" (right) is seen close to a relatively young star
A European team claims to have obtained the first direct image of a planet beyond our own Solar System.
The "extrasolar planet" is said to orbit a star called GQ Lup - thought to be like a young version of our Sun.

Similar claims have been made in the past, but sceptical scientists believe the pictures merely show objects that share the same view in the sky.

The GQ Lup object is far more certain claims Ralph Neuhaeuser's team in the journal Astronomy & Astrophysics.

GQ Lup and its companion are located in a star-forming region about 400 light-years away.

The "planet" has been observed by the team since 1999.

The astronomers have used image data from the European Southern Observatory's (ESO) Very Large Telescope (VLT) in Chile, the Hubble Space Telescope and the Japanese Subaru Telescope in Hawaii.

Because it is in a young system, the planet is said to be relatively hot. This helped the team detect the planet in the glare from its host star, the group says.

The planet is also quite far from GQ Lup - about 100 times the distance between the Sun and the Earth, which assisted the team in separating the light from the two objects.

The team models the mass of the companion to be 1-2 times that of our own Jupiter.

Astronomers have found about 130 exoplanets over the past decade, but most of these have been detected via the gravitational "wobbles" they induce in their parent stars.

The limitations of current technology make it very difficult to see a planet directly.

It is expected that such images will not become routinely available until new space-borne planet-hunting telescopes are launched in the next decade.

Some scientists have already questioned whether the GQ Lup companion is an exoplanet. Professor Mark McCaughrean, from Exeter University, UK, said he had concerns over the mass of the object, which by the team's own admission could be as high as 42 Jupiters.

"Almost all current theoretical models would peg the mass of this object at somewhere between 15 and 40 Jupiters: it's much more likely to be a brown dwarf (a failed star), not a planet", he said.

Professor McCaughrean added that while it appeared to be moving across the sky with the same velocity as GQ Lup, the companion could be just another faint object in the same region as the star, without being bound to it by gravity.

"There is no evidence whatsoever for true orbital motion of the faint source round the bright one," the Exeter researcher told the BBC News website.

SweetpeaAeryn
04-06-2005, 11:25 AM
Ooooh. Cool.

AgentSun
04-06-2005, 02:25 PM
well, at least it wasn't caught having an affair with another planet. that would've been embarassing.

but really, it's amazing news and it'll open a lot of doors for space exploration and more funding for research.

kellialwyd
04-06-2005, 11:46 PM
Astronomers Confident: Planet Beyond Solar System Has Been Photographed
By Robert Roy Britt
Senior Science Writer
posted: 10 January 2005
04:32 pm ET

SAN DIEGO -- Astronomers are highly confident that they've taken the first photograph of a planet outside our solar system.

Make that two photographs.

A new image from the Hubble Space Telescope confirms with a high degree of confidence a picture made previously by astronomers at the European Southern Observatory (ESO) and reported by SPACE.com in September.

The planet -- still just a candidate, actually -- is an odd duck in many respects. It does not orbit a normal star, and it is much more massive than the largest planets in our solar system.

Still, if confirmed, it represents a landmark in astronomy along the road to the ultimate goal of finding and photographing Earth-like planets around other stars.

The Hubble image was released here today at a meeting of the American Astronomical Society.

The planet candidate appears to orbit a failed star known as a brown dwarf. The initial observations at ESO's Very Large Telescope could not determine whether the apparent planet was actually at the same distance as the brown dwarf or if it was a background object. The Hubble observations show that the two indeed appear to be travelling together through the sky, suggesting they are gravitationally bound, as originally suspected.

University of Arizona astronomer Glenn Schneider, who led the new study, said he's 99.1 percent sure the object is in orbit around the brown dwarf. He expects to be 99.9 percent sure in April when more Hubble observations are made as the planet presumably moves a bit farther along in its orbit.

"Stay tuned for the final confirmation, but it's looking pretty good," Schneider said.

The planet candidate is about 1.5 times the diameter of Jupiter and about five times as massive. It orbits the brown dwarf star at about 30 percent farther than Pluto is from our Sun. The brown dwarf does not have enough mass to trigger thermonuclear fusion and shine like a normal star, but it is also outside the realm of planethood, being some 25 times more massive than Jupiter and glowing with infrared light.

The setup is about 225 light-years away.

"This is the first image of a planet outside our solar system," said UCLA astronomer Eric Becklin, quickly correcting himself to say it was an image most likely to be of an extrasolar planet. "So we really need to be sure."

Becklin and others eagerly await the April observations.

If confirmed, the finding would have "enormous impact" on the ability of astronomers to get funding for future telescopes that would look for Earth-like planets, said Steve Maran, press officer of the American Astronomical Society.

And what to make of a planet orbiting a failed star? Astronomers are already debating what constitutes a planet and whether the definition should include how they formed versus what they orbit.

Becklin, who was not involved in the imaging, said there is evidence for planets orbiting planets and planets floating alone in space with no star. If the latest image is proved to be what it seems, that would suggest "planets are around a lot of things," he said.
http://www.space.com/php/multimedia/imagedisplay/img_display.php?pic=planet_picture_040910_02.jpg&cap=The+red+object+appears+to+be+a+planet+orbiting +the+brighter+%28but+still+relatively+dim%29+brown +dwarf+star%2C+seen+here+as+blue-white.+Credit%3A+ESO%2FVLT